(Spoiler: There are none)
Recently there’s been talk about rating books without reading them. And though I personally have not rated anything before reading (not even a DNF, I think!), there really aren’t any rules concerning this. Etiquette? Maybe. But since Goodreads never defines what their ratings are for, it’s really free game.
In other words, it’s perfectly fine to rate a book without reading it. And here are some reasons why I think that’s the case:
1. As mentioned before, I don’t feel as if Goodreads does a good job defining what the star ratings are for. The most obvious is that it’s a rating of how much you liked the book. Or disliked it. Or it could be a rating of how much you don’t want to read the book. Or do want to read it. Users are allowed to use the rating system as they see fit, expanding upon it in the review section.
2. Goodreads doesn’t even add the book to your shelves as “read” after you rate it. I just tested this, and the book I rated remained on my “Want to Read” list. So okay, Goodreads obviously knows that users will rate books that aren’t necessarily something they read.
3. You might ask, why would they do that? Well that’s my next point. The fact that Goodreads even allows for the rating of books before their release date, or without even being on a certain shelf, shows that they are okay with it. Now, it might not be for the intention of deflating the rating of a problematic book, but their intentions were most likely to help with promotion. And excitement. Like I said, if they really didn’t want this to happen, they would have restricted the rating to after release, like Amazon does.
To be honest, I see Goodreads as the #1 place to find out about books. Before I joined the book community, I would rely a lot on the avg. rating to pick my books. That’s why I feel like one-starring problematic books on Goodreads is the best way to get the message out. That way, readers outside the community will avoid it because of its low rating. Of course, saying this is a bit controversial, and well, this is just how I feel about it I suppose!
Yet after saying all of that, I don’t think I would personally rate a book I haven’t read. However, I do hope my post convinces you that it’s something that’s fine to do.
Cait @ Paper Fury 124p · 428 weeks ago
Valerie 116p · 427 weeks ago
It really is all confusing and sad, and I agree with your "I don't want to read this" option. I think people add it on shelves, but if I assume correctly, that still puts the book on your "Want to read" shelf.
kozbisa 44p · 428 weeks ago
Sam @ WLABB
Valerie 116p · 427 weeks ago
Anjali · 428 weeks ago
I only rate books that I've actually read, and because it's not often that I 'Did Not Finish' a book, it works out okay.
It is sad when people rate books at the lower end before they're even released, though.
Great post!
Valerie 116p · 427 weeks ago
Thanks Anjali!
shannonmiz 83p · 428 weeks ago
I also think it is just as annoying in reverse- when the author's friends, mom, brother, dog, sandwich artist, etc all 5 star the book, only for me to read it like "wait what is this fresh hell, why did it have a 4.6 Goodreads rating?" And then... blame the barista.
Valerie 116p · 427 weeks ago
omg someone's sandwich lol
FoolsIngenuity 93p · 427 weeks ago
I get the logic behind rating without reading but I am someone who will always want to form my own opinion by reading first. I'll let you know if I find a book which forces me to change my mind.
Valerie 116p · 427 weeks ago
divabooknerd 73p · 427 weeks ago
I think I'm just a Goodreads traditionalist really. I don't like positive ratings before a book had been read either.
Valerie 116p · 427 weeks ago
I used to be so confused about the positive ratings before a book came out. I guess I still am?
joyousreads 92p · 427 weeks ago
Valerie 116p · 427 weeks ago
Nicole 98p · 427 weeks ago
Valerie 116p · 427 weeks ago
books for a delicate eternity 69p · 427 weeks ago
Michelle · 426 weeks ago
I don't know it just feels a little like "Regina George wore army pants and flip flops, so I went out and bought army pants and flip flops". It's now the cool thing to just parrot what other people say and run from drama to drama-- and I just want people to stop and THINK for themselves. Not saying there aren't exceptions-- and I'm not saying we all need to "read the book to find out for ourselves", I'm just saying people need to think before just throwing out 1 star ratings because so-and-so said to.
Jeann 122p · 424 weeks ago